QuANTUM-First study design

QuANTUM-First is the first pivotal trial to specifically study patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML from induction, through consolidation and maintenance1,2
The efficacy and safety of VANFLYTA (quizartinib) were studied in QuANTUM-First – a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, global study of 539 adult patients between 18 and 75 years of age, with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD+ AML. Patients were randomised to placebo (n=271) or VANFLYTA (n=268).1,2
The primary efficacy measure was overall survival, defined as the time from randomisation until death from any cause.1,2
QuANTUM-First STUDY DESIGN AND ENDPOINTS2,3
Adapted from Erba, et al. 20232,3
overall survival1,2
EFS, CR and CRc2
RFS and DoCR2
Standard chemotherapy included cytarabine- and anthracycline-based induction and consolidation regimens (either daunorubicin or idarubicin). Eligible patients, including those who underwent allogeneic HSCT, continued with single-agent VANFLYTA or standard chemotherapy.1-3
A second course of induction was administered to 21% of the patients; 65% initiated at least one cycle of consolidation; and 44% initiated maintenance treatment with VANFLYTA:2
- For patients concomitantly receiving a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, the dose was reduced to 20 mg/day2
Baseline patient characteristics2
|
Patient characteristics |
VANFLYTA + standard |
Placebo + standard |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, years |
|||
|
Median (range) |
56 (23–75) |
56 (20–75) |
|
|
≥60 years, % |
40 |
40 |
|
|
Sex, % |
|||
|
Male |
46 |
45 |
|
|
Female |
54 |
55 |
|
|
Race, % |
|||
|
Asian |
30 |
29 |
|
|
Black or African American |
1 |
2 |
|
|
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0 |
<1 |
|
|
White |
59 |
60 |
|
|
Other |
10 |
9 |
|
|
ECOG performance status, % † |
|||
|
0 |
32 |
36 |
|
|
1 |
50 |
50 |
|
|
2 |
18 |
13 |
|
|
Cytogenetic risks, %‡ |
|||
|
Favourable |
5 |
7 |
|
|
Intermediate |
74 |
71 |
|
|
Unfavourable |
7 |
10 |
|
|
Unknown |
14 |
11 |
|
|
Missing |
0 |
<1 |
|
Adapted from Erba, et al. 20232
*Three patients in the ITT set were randomised but not treated in each arm.2
†One patient in the placebo group was missing an ECOG status.2
‡Favourable: inv(16), t(16;16), t(8;21) or t(15;17); intermediate: normal, 8, 6 or −Y; unfavourable: deI(5q), −5, del(7q), −7 or complex karyotype.2
Of the 539 randomised patients:
- The majority of the patients (72%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics at baseline2
- FLT3-ITD VAF was ≥3% to ≤25% in 36% of patients, >25% to ≤50% in 52% of patients, and >50% in 12% of patients2
- NPM1 mutations were identified in 52% of patients2